We recently informed you about an FAA decision that could impact what constitutes “supervision” of aircraft maintenance and repair. The Moss Interpretation was a response to a simple question about the role of remote technology in aircraft maintenance and repair. The FAA’s response meant a certified mechanic would have to directly oversee all work, disallowing supervision via remote devices. It was also understood to mean having a certified mechanic available for consultation and to confirm the work was done properly, was insufficient. Such an approach would put an undue burden on smaller businesses.
On October 15, the FAA issued a temporary legal stay on this interpretation but the battle is not over. This stay will prevent shops from making immediate, costly adaptations to comply with the new standards while the FAA continues reviewing its policies and regulatory options.
The Moss interpretation was not born from a concern about aviation safety. The current system has been in place, and has been preventing aviation accidents, for decades. The group appealing the Moss Interpretation has requested a meeting with the FAA to discuss the best path forward. We will keep you informed of any updates.
See our previous article What does FAA 14 CFR§ 43.3 Really Mean? Here >>
